Draft Human Health Mitigation Plan – Background and Glossary
Background
When the Georgetown South Project Environmental Study Report (also called an
Environmental Assessment or EA) was completed in July 2009, the Minister of the
Environment (MOE) requested,
among other things, more analysis about any human health impacts from emissions
following the implementation by GO Transit of Tier 4 emission standards – a new,
more stringent engine technology.
We were also asked to draft a revised human health mitigation plan to address
residual health risks, if any, after moving to Tier 4-compliant locomotives.
Consultation Period
We invited the community to participate in the 30-day consultation period to have their
say on the draft Human Health Mitigation Plan. The consultation period was from
June 2 to July 4, 2011.
We prepared the materials in the following sections, held community briefing
sessions and encouraged the community to drop by one of our community offices to provide feedback on our draft Human Health Mitigation Plan.
If you'd like to learn more about the work
that was done and what was outlined in the draft Human Health and Mitigation
Plan, you can click theough the tabs in this section. The section has been divided into a number of tabs; here’s what you’ll
find in each:
- Work Plan: This section will explain how Metrolinx
conducted the analysis and provide information on what has changed from the
last report.
- Findings: This section will report some of the key
findings from the analysis.
- Mitigation Strategy: Here you will find the draft Human
Health and Mitigation Plan. You will also learn about other government
initiatives to improve regional air quality.
- Resources: This section contains the two reports
outlining the enhanced analysis for modeling air quality and assessing human
health impacts that are available for your review.
- Feedback: Learn more about how you can give us your
feedback on the Human Health and Mitigation Plan.
Not sure what Tier 4 is? Want to learn more about the chemicals of concern?
Before you move on to the next section, review our glossary
of terms.
Before you move on to the next sections, take a moment to review the
Highlights of the Human Health Assessment and Mitigation Plan below. It will
give an overview of what we found and what we are doing.
Community Briefing Sessions
We’ve also hosted some Community Briefing Sessions, which included an
opportunity to ask for clarification directly with to our air quality and human
health experts.
Thursday, June 9, 2011
6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
York West Active Living Centre
1901 Weston Road
|
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
Harbourfront Community Centre
627 Queens Quay West
|
Thursday, June 16, 2011
6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
Lithuanian House
1573 Bloor Street West
|
If you were unable to attend the sessions, you can
view the presentation. All materials at the sessions are available in the
following sections.
Glossary
This glossary of terms is provided to help explain scientific terms and
processes used in the air quality modeling completed by Metrolinx. We hope
that this guide is a useful glossary to help you understand the scientific
modeling completed during the Additional Review of Human Health Assessment.
View
the PDF here
90th Percentile Approach
- The 90th percentile reflects that 90% of the results were
below a given mark and that 10% of the results were above. In the case
of the 2009 Environmental Assessment for the Georgetown South Project,
the background air quality was established at the 90th
percentile for all scenarios.
- The hourly method we used in the current re‐assessment, in contrast,
uses all of the available hourly data to refine the modeling which
increases its accuracy.
Acute
- An acute effect happens within a short time after an exposure (i.e.,
may be minutes or days). An acute short‐term exposure can result in
short‐ or long‐term health effects.
Air Quality Monitoring and Reporting Plan
- The GTS Project Air Quality Monitoring and Reporting Plan monitors a
group of chemicals of concern from three reporting stations along the
Georgetown rail corridor. Quarterly reports from the readings will be
used to confirm whether the levels outlined in the Environmental
Assessment and reassessed during the recent Additional Review of the
Human Health Assessment work plan validate the conservative assumptions
used in the modeling work.
- This plan was prepared in consultation with Toronto’s Medical Officer
of Health, Environment Canada, the Ministry of the Environment and
community representatives. It was approved by the Ministry of the
Environment on June 2, 2010.
Background level
- A typical or average level or concentration of a chemical or substance
in the environment, without any contribution from the proposed project
(e.g. GTS Project).
Chemicals of Concern
- These are air contaminants that have been identified as possibly
having an impact on the environment and/or human health.
Concentration
- The proportion of one substance contained in a given sample amount.
Environmental Assessment (EA)
- An environmental assessment is a process to evaluate the potential
environmental effects of an infrastructure project. In Ontario, this
process is governed by the Environmental Assessment Act and the Ministry
of the Environment, under Ontario Regulation 231/08. Metrolinx completed
the Georgetown South Project Environmental Study Report in July 2009. In
October 2009, the Minister of the Environment approved the GTS Project
subject to some conditions.
Exceedance
- When the modeled results show that the concentration of a chemical or
substance is above the applicable guideline. For instance, any modeled
result which shows the annual average concentrations of NO2
above 40 μg/m3 is an exceedance of the World Health
Organization guideline for annual NO2.
Human Health Mitigation Plan
- Metrolinx’s plan to address any residual human health impact after
implementing Tier 4 emission standards for the GO and Air Rail Link
locomotive fleets on the Georgetown line.
Modeling Scenario
- A modeling scenario is predictive tool to assess a future hypothetical
situation. Our approach involved modeling the emission levels for the
following scenarios: full build, future no build and opening day
scenarios. For the first two scenarios, the modeling was done for
pre‐Tier and Tier 4 conditions. Opening day was only a pre‐Tier 4
scenario.
- Future Full Build: This is the maximum theoretical projection of train
service on the Georgetown rail corridor. The actual future volumes will
be significantly lower because of operating restrictions (e.g. capacity
at Union Station) and actual passenger demand.
- Future No Build: This scenario reflects the number of additional train
service that could theoretically be accommodated without any
infrastructure improvements. In other words, this would be the amount of
additional off‐peak train service that could be added using existing
infrastructure. Since we are building more infrastructure, this scenario
is purely hypothetical.
- Opening Day 2015: This is the number of trains that will be operating
on opening day in 2015 with the expansion in infrastructure now
underway.
Non‐Road Diesel Tier Emission Standards (Tier 0 to Tier 4)
- The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established
exhaust emission standards to regulate emission limits for all types of
newly‐manufactured or remanufactured diesel engines. The standards range
from Tier 0 to the latest standard, Tier 4, which goes into effect in
2015. Each standard further reduces diesel emissions.
- Tier 4 reduces NO2 and PM2.5 emissions by up to
90%.
- GO Transit currently uses Tier 2 diesel locomotive engines. The latest
standard available today.
- Tier 4 locomotive engines will be available for new locomotives
beginning in 2015. The Air Rail Link and 10 GO locomotives will be Tier
4 on opening day in 2015. GO will refurbish the balance of its
locomotive fleet to Tier 4 afterwards.
Ozone Limiting Method
- When oxides of nitrogen (NOx) are emitted in diesel
exhaust, the initial composition is dominated by nitric oxide (NO). Once
in the air, some of the NO is oxidized in reaction with other pollutants
(principally ground‐level ozone) to produce NO2, which is the
oxide of nitrogen that has the most significant health implications. Not
all NOx
emissions convert to NO2 in the air. The ozone limiting
method was used to estimate the maximum short‐term NO2
concentrations from NOx
emissions, to allow for a more accurate prediction of ground‐level NO2.
Particulate Matter – Fine (PM2.5)
- Airborne particulate matter describes a mixture of microscopic solid
particles and liquid droplets suspended in air. Fine particulate matter
refers to particles that are 2.5 microns in diameter – this is 30 times
smaller than the diameter of human hair.
- At 2.5 microns, ultra‐fine particulate matter is captured in the PM2.5
assessment
- Health Impact:
Elevated levels above the regulatory benchmark, can lead to:
- Cardiopulmonary and respiratory disease
- Respiratory irritant
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
- Nitrogen is the most abundant element in the air. Oxides of nitrogen
(NOx), including nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
gases, are produced during high temperature combustion, for example
forest fires, transportation (combustion engine)
- Health Impact:
On bad air (smog) days, the most sensitive individual will experience:
- Itchy eyes
- Shortness of breath during strenuous activity
- Respiratory irritation
Sensitive Receptor
- A sensitive receptor is a location where outdoor activity occurs often
and represents a population that is more sensitive to air emissions than
other members of a population. For example, children and the elderly are
more sensitive to air emissions that an average adult.
- Our assessment included sensitive receptors such as schools, daycares,
and seniors residents.
- This is a conservative approach to model the effects on the most
sensitive population.
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
- SO2 is a colourless gas that smells like burnt matches ‐ it
can also be oxidized to form sulphuric acid aerosols. It is produced
primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels and is a precursor to
sulphates, which are one of the main components of airborne fine
particulate matter.
- Health Impact:
Elevated levels above the regulatory benchmark can lead to:
- Cardiopulmonary and respiratory disease
- Respiratory irritation
Highlights of the Human Health Assessment and Mitigation Plan
In this section, we will provide you with highlights of the plan and
discuss what we found, and what our plan is to mitigate human health
impacts. We have provided the comprehensive findings and the detailed
mitigation plan in the following tabs.
What we found
- No significant human health risk caused by future GO/Air Rail Link
(ARL) service
- Tier 4 technology effectively reduces GO/ARL train engine emissions
- GO/ARL plays an important role in improving air quality by moving
people out of cars and onto public transit
- Background air quality exceeds regulatory guidelines for some modeled
chemicals of concern
Our Plan
- Monitor and Minimize GO/Air Rail Link emissions
- Implement air quality monitoring plan
- Install 3 air quality monitoring stations
- Use results of air quality monitoring to confirm modeling
- Implement Tier 4 technology for Air Rail Link and the entire GO
locomotive fleet
- Air Rail Link and 10 GO trains will be Tier 4 on opening day; the
rest of the GO fleet is scheduled to be refurbished to Tier 4
afterwards.
- Do our part to improve air quality in the region
- Through The Big Move, Metrolinx has a 25-year plan to create an
integrated and sustainable transportation future for the Greater Toronto
and Hamilton Area.
- One of the major objectives of The Big Move is to reduce
transportation-related air emissions that will improve background air
quality. By moving people by public transit and active transportation
options (e.g. walking, cycling), Metrolinx will be doing its part to
spare the air.
- Support government initiatives to improve air quality in the province
- Metrolinx is supporting government initiatives, such as the
province’s Growth Plan and Go Green: Ontario’s Action Plan on Climate
Change, through its planning and investment in expanding public transit
and other active transportation options.
What else have we done since receiving conditional approval?
Since we received the Minister of Environment’s conditional approval, we
have taken several steps to ensure that GO Transit continues to be a leader
in adopting emission reducing technologies:
Ordered Diesel Multiple Units (DMUs) for the ARL Service
- On February 18, 2011, the Metrolinx Board of Directors approved a plan
to purchase 12 Tier 4 Diesel Multiple Units (DMUs) for the Air Rail Link
(ARL) service. The DMUs use the latest clean diesel technology and are
convertible to electric propulsion.
Moved Ahead with Tier 4 Refurbishment of GO Locomotive Fleet
- A request for proposal will close in June 2011 to test prototype Tier
4 diesel locomotive engine technology and to refurbish 10 GO train
locomotives by 2015. The rest of the locomotive fleet is scheduled to be
refurbished to Tier 4 emission standards afterwards.
Recommended electrification of the GO Georgetown and Lakeshore
Lines
- On January 26, 2011, the Metrolinx Board of Directors approved a staff
recommendation to begin electrification of the Lakeshore and Georgetown
GO Transit rail corridors in a phased approach. The new ARL service is
identified as the first phase for electrification. The province has
agreed to the commencement of the environmental assessment for the ARL
service, which is now in progress.